Well
Just to add a bit of seriousness to the debate ;-), I've never really
like fusebox, but we recently gave it another go on a new project and it
isn't actually that bad. Just wondered if any one had any really,
really, really good reasons not to use it. 

Theres actually a few bits in there that you could use independently of
fusebox which I quite like, fusedocs, wireframes etc.


Kola 

-----Original Message-----
From: Russ 'Snake' Michaels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 15 August 2002 16:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Fusebox

No, you were bad b4

-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Wild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 August 2002 16:11
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Fusebox


I've never used fusebox. Or looked at it for that matter.

Does this make me bad?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin MacCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 August 2002 16:22
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Fusebox
> 
> 
> To save time, I've set up a rule for mails with a subject containing
> "fusebox".
> 
> Apply when mail arrives with subject "fusebox"
> insert random flame,
> slag list members,
> reply to sender.
> 
> 
> :-) ~J
> 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to