Yep - I use it. I like a.. that it makes other people's code more transparent b.. that it makes it easier to extend the app at a later stage. c.. that it forces a lazy s*d like me to actually do some design ;-) No evangelism, though, if you've got good reasons not to use it, don't. CF is fantastically flexible and can encompass any number of methodologies. Confession time: I also pick the choice bits and ignore some of the more arcane stuff! ----- Original Message ----- From: Stephen Pope To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:14 AM Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list?
I'm curious just how many people on this list use fusebox ? Personally I hate the thing, I like the ideas involved and but I prefer to adapt the methodology to my own code in my own way. I'm not having a go at fusebox coders (although I do kinda think Mach II is a bit hilarious) I just think that I have found some people and companies that hate Coldfusion just for the fact that they have only used /see it in relation to Fusebox ! Just wondered how much people on this list used it and if they have always done fusebox or moved to it after learning CF initially. Just being curious I guess hehe :¬) /me awaits the flames Stephen -----Original Message----- From: Damian Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 October 2003 10:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? aaaaaarrrgggg my brain's fused I thought fusebox was meant to be simple ;0) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:48 AM Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? > I've actually found that globals is not that good an idea as it makes > maintenance a pain. > > If you do require includes from another fuse, then work the path out and > include (../security/queries/qry_member_details_select.cfm) > > BUT > > There is no hard and fast rule. > > What I would say is that if your fuse requires functions from another fuse, > then you should maybe consider them to be sub fuses and not seperate > independent fuses. > > The other option is to copy the files into the fuse. At least you'll know > the code will work exactly as planned within that fuse and any changes to > the other fuse will not impact other fuses. > > Adam > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ellwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 24 October 2003 10:25 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] Any fusecoders on the list? > > > > > > True, I hadn't thought of that. If I wish to drag my circuit to another > > application then it will fail because of the globals being missing. > > > > This is why I asked the question in the first place. Thanks for your > > valuable input I will rethink my strategy. Although I am > > currently wondering > > if there will ever be a perfect solution or just a best compromise. > > > > Regards > > > > Ellis > > > > > > > -- > ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
