Hmmm...Firebird/Interbase - sounds interesting, I'll have to
investigate.

Duncan Jack
Manager
Scottish ColdFusion User Group
promoting e-business excellence

www.scottishcfug.com
+44 (0) 7973 718303


Important Note: This message contains confidential information which is
intended to be passed to the addressee only.  Please advise the sender
by telephone on the number shown above if this message has been sent in
error to the wrong address.  We acknowledge that e-mail is not an
entirely secure medium of communication and you should be aware of this
when replying. Although we believe that any attachments are free from
any virus, we can give no guarantee.


-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 16 November 2003 10:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX and Access 2000

Thanks again, Duncan - I had seen that one.

As to alternatives, I'm inclined towards Firebird/Interbase at the
moment, 
rather than MySQL, partly because much of the SQLServer functionality is

already built in, whereas we have to wait for MySQL v5 to get a little 
more than it already has.

Cheers
Terry

----------Original Message---------  

> Terry
> 
> Ben Forta wrote a useful article on the same subject:
> 
> http://www.sys-con.com/coldfusion/article.cfm?id=115
> 
> Notice Ben's comments on shared file-based DB's (e.g. Access) versus
> client-server DB's (e.g. MySQL).
> 
> As an aside, MySQL doesn't currently support stored procedures, yet
> apparently this will be changed in MySQL 5.
> 
> Enjoy
> 
> Duncan Jack
> Manager
> Scottish ColdFusion User Group
> promoting e-business excellence
> 
> www.scottishcfug.com
> +44 (0) 7973 718303
> 
> 
> Important Note: This message contains confidential information which
is
> intended to be passed to the addressee only.  Please advise the sender
> by telephone on the number shown above if this message has been sent
in
> error to the wrong address.  We acknowledge that e-mail is not an
> entirely secure medium of communication and you should be aware of
this
> when replying. Although we believe that any attachments are free from
> any virus, we can give no guarantee.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Riley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 14 November 2003 18:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ cf-dev ] CFMX and Access 2000
> 
> Thanks for the reference, Duncan.
> 
> Cheers
> Terry
> 
> ----------Original Message---------  
> 
> > 
> > Terry
> > 
> > Check out the following article:
> > 
> > http://www.microsoft.com/AccessDev/Articles/QAJET30.HTM
> > 
> > 
> > Extract below:
> > 
> > "This document is for users and developers who have questions about
> the
> > MicrosoftR Jet database engine. Microsoft Jet is a powerful, yet
often
> > misunderstood technology. It lies at the core of the popular
Microsoft
> > Access database system and also provides powerful capabilities to
many
> > other applications. The latest version of Microsoft Jet has been
> > enhanced to provide greater performance and new features.
> > 
> > Theoretically, Microsoft Jet can support 255 simultaneous
connections
> to
> > one database. The practical limit to the number of users Jet can
> handle
> > in multiuser applications depends on many factors. Applications
whose
> > primary task is to perform queries can handle more users than
> > applications whose primary task is to update data. The network and
> file
> > server also play an important role in calculating this limit. In a
> > properly configured network setting, Jet can easily support 25-50
> users
> > in a transaction-orientated environment. Some multiuser applications
> > function well with 80 users."
> > 



-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
** Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40lists.cfdeveloper.co.uk/

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For human help, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to