Hi Ludwig,

you are right, when i talk about only allowing to narrow the rights I am
talking about view-right only (which is the one that is regulated by two
unrelated systems currently).


On 03/15/2011 12:56 PM, Ludwig Theunis wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> The idea to use one rights system seems logic.
> 
> Just the idea of allowing only narrowing the rights whenn you go down
> tree will not work I think.
> 
> For a student the course itself is always (in most cases) Readonly, the
> documents tool mostly is also readonly,  the dropbox in the documents
> module is not readonly, here the student will need write rights to.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Ludwig
> 
> 
>     Currently the weblcms is using 2 right-systems
>     1) the global right system to set righs on tools and categories etc
>     2) a second right-system to set rights on publications
> 
>     this prevents us from doing certain things we want to do there. (see
>     redmine for some of the issues)
>     it is also not a good idea to mix 2 different rights-systems in one
>     application I think.
> 
>     I think we should use the chamilo rights system for everything in the
>     weblcms.
> 
>     This should be discussed asap, before everybody starts to try to work
>     around this problem, complicating things even further.
> 
>     to me it seems the best solution that you have one location tree
> 
>     - course
>            - tool
>                    - category
>                            -  publication
> 
>     and allow the inheritance of the rights. It would also be best if we
>     could enforce that you can only narrow the rights when you go down the
>     tree: If someone does not have view-rights on the course, tool or
>     category, it should not be possible to give him/here view-rights on the
>     publication.
> 
> 
>     we particularly need this to "mimic" some of the tools in 1.8.x like
>     group-documents, studentpublications, teacher publications, ... with
>     categories in the documents and forum-tools that have certain pre-set
>     rights.
> 
>     Kind regards,
>     Nathalie
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Dev mailing list
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     http://lists.chamilo.org/listinfo/dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.chamilo.org/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.chamilo.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to