I am not recommending. It was suggested in email below. I am against that recommendation.
Regards -Harshad > On Oct 12, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Foucault de Bonneval <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Harshad, > > Could you explain why you'd recommend a Zookeeper cluster for analytics ? > > Thanks, > Foucault > > 2016-10-12 15:39 GMT+02:00 Harshad Nakil <[email protected]>: >> No we cannot. I will also not recommend analytics having its own zookeeper. >> >> Regards >> -Harshad >> >> >>> On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:53 AM, Pavani Addanki <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Jakub, >>> >>> Can we set a Centralized analytics node. (ex for 5 Contrail instances with >>> 1 single Analytics node) >>> >>> Pavani >>> >>> ____________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Jakub Pavlik <[email protected]> >>> To: Pavani Addanki <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Edgar Magana <[email protected]>, >>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Date: 10/11/2016 12:59 AM >>> Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Customized Contrail installation >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Pavani, >>> >>> what I recommend you is to separate analytics from other components with >>> own cassandra, zookeeper, kafka cluster. >>> >>> Then you can set disable_flow_collection=True on contrail-collector as well >>> as vrouter-agent. Next step can be set ttl on all analytics data to 1 and >>> change compaction strategy on cassandra cluster to >>> DateTieredCompactionStrategy. >>> >>> >>> Jakub >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Pavani Addanki <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Edgar >>> >>> Pavani >>> ____________________________________________ >>> >>> -----Edgar Magana <[email protected]> wrote: ----- >>> >>> ======================= >>> To: Pavani Addanki <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >>> <[email protected]> >>> From: Edgar Magana <[email protected]> >>> Date: 10/10/2016 09:20PM >>> Subject: Re: [opencontrail-dev] Customized Contrail installation >>> ======================= >>> Hello, >>> >>> We deploy OpenContrail 2.21 in two different nodes. One is running all >>> control, config and ifmap resources when the other only analytics and web >>> UI. >>> If the second node goes down, we can still create resources and data plane >>> is not affected. However, it is not being designed to work that well. So, I >>> will not recommend it. >>> >>> Edgar >>> >>> From: Dev <[email protected]> on behalf of Pavani Addanki >>> <[email protected]> >>> Date: Monday, October 10, 2016 at 1:20 AM >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Subject: [opencontrail-dev] Customized Contrail installation >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Can we install Contrail without Analytics node. >>> >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> Pavani >>> >>> =====-----=====-----===== >>> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail >>> message and/or attachments to it may contain >>> confidential or privileged information. If you are >>> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, >>> review, distribution, printing or copying of the >>> information contained in this e-mail message >>> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If >>> you have received this communication in error, >>> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and >>> immediately and permanently delete the message >>> and any attachments. Thank you >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
