Hello,
in my scenario, the network is associated with a interface of vSRX and
this interface have a valid IP address. In a normal environment I will
use a routing protocol to advertise this CIDR to network, this is what
I'm trying to figure out.
My scenario: vSRX with 3 interface MGT (192.168.44.0/24) ge-0/0/0
(189.39.11.1/24) ge-0/0/1 (189.39.12.1/24).
I'm not seeing a way to get this working with route aggregate, because
the route aggregation will work only until the last router that did the
route aggregation, this router will not have in this forwarding table a
valid next-hop to IP address 189.39.12.2 for example.
Regards,
Cleofas R. Schaden
WZTECH Networks
[email protected]
Em 02/03/2017 11:56, David bass escreveu:
Why would you want to advertise the entire /24, and not the specific routes for
instances that are actually on that physical hosts?
You would want to aggregate the route at a higher level.
On Mar 2, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Cleofas R Schaden <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello all,
There is a way to vRouter advertise the whole CIDR (/24 for example) to
physical gatewat and not the specific /32 that is correlated to a instance?
Example: When I create a network the CIDR allocated is 192.168.100.0/24. But
the addresses advertised to the physical gateway is only the addresses from
instances that are running.
Regards,
--
Cleofas R. Schaden
WZTECH Networks
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
