On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:18:49AM +0500, Valentine Sinitsyn wrote:
> Hi Ananth,
> 
> On 17.05.2017 11:00, Ananth Suryanarayana wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:50:38AM +0500, Valentine Sinitsyn wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Those are valid points. I'd add a few more, if you don't mind:
> >>
> >>1. Code quality (esp. in master branch)
> >>I've encountered undefined macros in vrouter-dpdk and shell escaping issues
> >>in dkms scripts at the very least. Sure, this is trivial to fix, yet it
> >>makes me think that either no one tried to compile those components besides
> >>me (as this fails immediately) or I do something awfully wrong. Which brings
> >>us to the second point:
> >>
> >>2. Public CI, maybe via Travis/Github badge
> >>This is to make sure the code works at least in some environment, so I can
> >>figure out what's wrong with mine. Aside issues mentioned above, BGP stress
> >>test is failing now as well, and there is no way to figure out is it my
> >>fault or the thing is currently broken.
> >I can certainly help out with bgp_stress_test failure. It is part of our
> >regular CI and is run for every commit applicable. May be it is not working
> >under some specific set of parameters that you are using with ? May I request
> >for more details regarding this ?
> Thank you for the help. Above, I've used BGP stress test mainly to
> illustrate my points, yet it of course would be good to fix this particular
> issue as well. I tried it some time ago; will do it again and come back with
> results and details to you shortly.

Thanks. I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards
Ananth

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org

Reply via email to