Valentine Sinitsyn wrote:
>What about the rest, that is TSC summit and Infra summit? Maybe Joseph and >Paul could comment on this? I don't think the infrastructure team's work so far has enough content to fill a summit session. Basically it would just be a status update. However, something infra-related that would be valuable, but pretty ambitious and require Juniper developer and tester participation, would be a hands-on how-to session on configuring development environment and adding test cases to test suites. I've set an objective of creating a contributor's guide, but it's fairly bare bones right now. It would be helpful to have a session where developers (and possibly test writers if Juniper separates those two groups internally) can exchange suggestions and questions on how to setup an efficient environment and workflow for developing code and the corresponding automated testing. If we did this, it would be highly technical with minimal slides and participants expected to have developer laptops and/or remote access to their dev environment. It could even be something of a hackathon if we get enough people who have already overcome the hurdles of initial setup and are ready to discuss specific obstacles they're hitting in the development and testing process. This is pretty ambitious, though. I can help coordinate, but I certainly can't set this up or provide the depth of experience. We would need experienced, successful Contrail developers to assist and guide new Contrail developers. >May I also re-iterate a question I asked on the previous thread: do one need a >KubeCon pass to be on OC Summit? "Undecided yet" is also a valid answer :) It looks like Kubecon is sold out, so scheduling OpenContrail events in a location that requires a KubeCon pass _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opencontrail.org/mailman/listinfo/dev_lists.opencontrail.org
