just a quick heads up that i doubt you can deploy any openshift version
(3.7+) with a docker version higher than 1.13.

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:07 PM Santosh Kumar30 <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> Are you saying that we require docker17 or later for Hyperledger fabric
> image deployment ?
>
> If yes, definitely we require additional Docker enterprise edition
> subscription to deploy it on Openshift 3.7, is this assumption is correct?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Santosh Kumar
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark Wagner <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 17, 2018 8:18 PM
> *To:* Jeremy Eder <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* [email protected]; Santosh Kumar30
> <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Re: Is Docker enterprise version subscription required for
> Openshift 3.7
>
>
>
> From the upstream Fabric list.
>
>
>
> Technically, at runtime right now Docker 1.13 or later will work for pure
> Docker and/or Kubernetes.
> The samples and example network rely on later versions of docker-compose
> which I believe require some features of Docker 17.06 and later (I think in
> the area of networks and volumes but don't recall explicitly and we
> definitely use docker exec commands in some of the samples which require
> 17.06).
>
> With 1.3 and earlier, you should still be able to build with Docker 1.13,
> but with the current master we've moved to multistage builds which require
> 17.06 and later to build.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> FWIW, I was able to use the Docker 1.13 version which ships with Redhat
> 7.x to build and run Redhat-based Fabric images.
>
> -- G
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:09 AM, Jeremy Eder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Mark, do you know where the version requirement in the hyperledger docs
> comes from?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 7:50 AM Santosh Kumar30 <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am recently started exploring openshift. I am a Hyperledger blockcahin
> developer.
>
> I am trying to create a blockchain network containing which will contain
> Hyperledger – peer, orderer, cli… and there images have been provided by
> Hyperledger.
>
>
>
> As per the Hyperledger doc, these images only compatable with Docker
> version 17.06.2-ce or greater .
>
>
> https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.3/prereqs.html#docker-and-docker-compose
>
>
>
> But as Openshift 3.7 release note:
> https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.7/release_notes/ocp_3_7_release_notes.html#ocp-37-about-this-release
>
>
>
> OpenShift Container Platform 3.7 is supported on RHEL 7.3, 7.4.2, 7.5, and
> Atomic Host 7.4.2 and newer with the latest packages from Extras, including
> Docker 1.12.
>
>
>
> So *my query here is if I need docker 17 or later version for this
> openshift 3.7, Whether I required Docker enterprise version subscription *as
> on RHEL linux system, docker CE version will not work?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Santosh Kumar
>
>
> ============================================================================================================================
>
> Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is
> proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy
> statement, you may review the policy at
> http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html externally
> http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html internally within
> TechMahindra.
>
>
> ============================================================================================================================
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> -- Jeremy Eder
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Mark Wagner
>
> Senior Principal Software Engineer
>
> Performance and Scalability
>
> Red Hat, Inc
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to