Isaac David <[email protected]> writes: > I think _little_ or _much_ evidence aren't the right quantifiers to > approach this issue. a single piece of evidence would suffice, whether > for Chromium or any other software. also, we should be cautious not to > redefine things in order to spare their faults; that would simply beg > the question of whether software foo is guilty of bar or not. along > those lines, was the upcoming article even supposed to touch on > Qt-WebEngine?
i think it's not a question of evidence at all, but of who is going to produce a completely libre source tarball of chromium for parabola and others to build on... sometimes it's just too much work! other times i feel people talks like it isn't on anybody's hands to do it, the "can't someone else do it?" attitude a diy distro shouldn't see often :) (i won't argue if removing chromium from kde packages was more or less time consuming than producing such tarball, since i wasn't involved nor even remotely interested in the freedomness of chromium) -- :D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
