my previous post could be could be summarized like so: the issue of "who is credited in the PKGBUILD?" is relatively minor
the issue of "is this package _actually_ well-maintained?" is much more important a package with one dedicated maintainer should indicate that the package is better maintained than a "team-maintained" package i am not against the idea of all PKGBUILDs being denoted as "team-maintained"; but in that case, the "Maintainer" line is irrelevant information to include in the PKGBUILD - its just noise, with no value _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
