> What do you want the formal name of the operating system to be? > > Options brought up so far: > 1. "Parabola GNU/Linux-libre" > 2. "Parabola GNU/Linux" > 3. "Parabola GNU" > 4. "Parabola" > > Both 1 and 2 have been the official official name so far. [...] > Options 3 and 4 have appealed to several of us because it opens the > possibilites of other kernels, such as GNU HURD or kFreeBSD.
We can use the Debian way of naming the whole system/project "Parabola", the system with Linux-libre (and packages built to use glibc on Linux ABIs) "Parabola GNU/Linux-libre", with Hurd "Parabola GNU/Hurd", with kFreeBSD "Parabola GNU/kLibreBSD" or "Parabola GNU/kFreeBSD-libre" depending on kernel deblobbing. So my argument is mostly for 4, although practically it's for 1 until we have a port for another kernel. (A port to a FreeBSD kernel would make a name like "Parabola GNU/Linux-libre mips64el" necessary to avoid ambiguity.)
pgpJkOvIyXNlz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
