At Sun, 30 Mar 2014 11:27:05 -0300, Nicolás Reynolds wrote: > At Sun, 30 Mar 2014 07:52:23 +0000 (UTC), > orschiro wrote: > > @fauno > > > > Thanks, that makes it clear. Using the pcr repo is not an option. Too > > many occurring conflicts: > > > > :: Starting full system upgrade... > > :: Replace blender with pcr/blender-spacenav-libre? [Y/n] n > > warning: etckeeper: local (1.11-1) is newer than pcr (1.4-1) > > :: Replace imagemagick with pcr/imagemagick-srv? [Y/n] ^C > > i think this is a problem, packages in [pcr] shouldn't remove anything > From your system... the "replaces" field should be left out for > packages that would just conflict with another, in that way you can use > [pcr] and still pick what you want to have installed. > > also, there're some packages in [pcr] that were later put in > [community].
That's definately a problem. libretools/dbscripts/parabolaweb feature request: Ensure that no replace=()ed package is available on the repos. Also a problem is that blender-spacenav-libre doesn't have a PKGBUILD in abslibre. It seems that it was in [artistic], and that the PKGBUILD didn't survive all those things being moved to [prc]. libretools/dbscripts/parabolaweb feature request: Ensure consistency between abslibre and the repos. Also, this made me aware that etckeeper is out of date. libretools/parabolaweb feature request: Add an in-band way to "subscribe" to various upstream changes--the package in Arch, the package in AUR, or the actual upstream. Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
