-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Sorry for the encrypted mail... I didn't resend it because I don't think it brings any significant point to the debate. It is available here for the record:
On 08/29/2014 02:26 PM, hellekin wrote: > On 08/29/2014 08:32 AM, Michał Masłowski wrote: >> >>> It opens another similar question, should we follow the real >>> name which we are using from the source, or the packages >>> created from Arch? >> >> Name the browser iceweasel, don't rename calibre, sdl, etc. >> > *** I always found this very obnoxious. In conversation what do > you use? Firefox? Iceweasel? Icecat? Really, it's confusing, > and it was just to mock the Mozilla branding policy. It should not > be a rule of the trade. Calibre-libre is explicit: it's calibre, > freed from the proprietary stuff. In general, I would prefer > upstream name, unless Arch, Debian, Fedora agree on something else, > then it would be silly to bring more confusion. > >> >> Do it like Debian: keep the original package names, rename source >> files. >> > *** Well, Debian tends to rename the packages to its > nomenclature's taste. E.g. python-*, lib*-dev, ruby-*... I like to > be able to figure out the package name from the source project, and > having "mu" is more appealing to me than "mailutils" especially > because the "mu" program (a "sup" like) is anterior to GNU > mailutils' "mu" program. Anyway, as long as naming is > consistent... > > But yes, suffixing the version instead of the package name is a > good idea. > > So to conclude, I'd favor <package>-libre when the source is > changed to remove or replace dependencies on non-free software, > with a one-one relation to the original package name, AND a > -parabola suffix in the package version for branding. The > -parabola suffix then, would only appear in the version of > packages, but not in the package name itself. > > Therefore, a package from Arch called fubar v0.1.3, would become > fubar v0.1.3-parabola in Parabola. Another package offshore-wallet > v0.2.4 with Adipo Flush(TM) support would become > offshore-wallet-libre v0.2.4-parabola (maybe with GNU Gnash > support). > > My 2 pesos, > > == hk _______________________________________________ Dev mailing > list [email protected] > https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUArIFXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ3MDM3QTJCNjlFNkMxQzA1NjI4RDUzOEZE OEU3QkQ4MDk0MUM4MjkzAAoJENjnvYCUHIKTYToQALakKxlIeeSnVFxVrLG8O1fU K8850pfy1/HCWxl1BrRw23VBc3yJf7VwGvBX0dRM87uk061pAmXJ6/LpxY/ySCMb IJn8YBFsxzmt19/i8ZbEYFVY/1+5LeygIyXIWbvyxqCfG0MIjU55Qxri7xoTCR6n lz5xqNWSdYufeYu+NM7XfYUIu4aH07h/a7q1QwT121SEduZRgTe6V7Qqwxgc3Yo+ Sexx77ZOLc5yDpD9acHKrqx0LdE8YAyrtm1eG24RxQXj9EjfmMD04Eon8A6zzuLG P57IPbJfdwy6imZ7ZMBjkd7aWnNukjFRvlO+bbGSZzhXzRdGYvolu6b3nvNsw5zZ dvtadApdIJ9zfUrdmgCYl/9dQJdZfuDd7p7yA+j1z4vPun5/OJFK5O+OsJRmrrOh WAct+pDZZ5O/xclXKYNCtxPVt2d5Ipx1rlka3b8PSrmEwN4gXRPZGAJY3nGKoUds Xh5ViPTXl6bLengER9reQ0vphQX8KsUnZD7fXAkKqcpUxeI7bbWlbgW4NFjuI5zF 6fYm/kK8qr5uofFhngHtyK9LoHCcXj9Q/WOdcagqadyF9Bx+POjQxKk46dYZsXix IcZOyvpHJ++wJHEIf1IFHtHBH91S3K1efoHj3z/HyZZQsjY1BXG2tLiag3APixch ENHH8l5FpMydWzw8UsXh =1tC0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.parabolagnulinux.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
