Marco Wertejuk wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> is anyone already trying to get postgres fixes which don't
> break support for other DBs?
> 
> I'm currently trying to fix every problem step by step
> but maybe someone has already fixed it? According to sf.net
> cvs web there are no interesting checkins since 0.1-20051007
> at least not regarding postgres.
> 
> Who would like to check my diffs (when finished) and commit them?
> 

I'm waiting on CVS access, and then I was thinking to work on postgres
support.

But please post your patches. I have my own ideas about what to change,
but I don't mind looking at other peoples ideas.

John
=:->

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to