Jon Daley wrote:
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, B. Johannessen wrote:
Messages with a Reply-To: header field already present will not
have it replaced.
Given the starred portion below, should I assume that people who are
explicitly setting the reply-to field (particularly when they set it
to the content of the from field, rather than something else)
actually want to get direct mail?
Yes! Reply-To is optional and controlled by the author. In essence it's
the author saying "If you reply to this message, please send your reply
to this address". This is one reason I think it's a bad idea to add a
Reply-To header fields to list messages, and a *REALLY* bad idea to
replace Reply-To in such messages.
As en example, I've set Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for this message, as this
has nothing to do with RoundCube development, and if I am to continue
this discussion I'd rather do it off list.
Bob
