2010.12.02 06:44, David Garabana Barro rašė:
> For all the translators, you can find info about those headers on the
> following URL:
>
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
> http://www.leptonite.org/mft/
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Help_Documentation:Mail-Followup-
> To_and_Mail-Reply-To

While we're at this:
I find this extremely unnecessary and confusing to have both links – 
"Add Reply-To" and "Add Mail-Reply-To" – in the compose page. If 
Roundcube developers believe in Mail-Reply-To's usefullness, then a 
single link (Add Reply address) should simply add both headers. If you 
don't believe in this header, or think this should be up to somebody 
(admin or user) to decide, then either remove it, or make it an option 
(either in the config file or in the interface). But don't just drop 
both of these headers on users and expect them to do what's right, 
because most of them will not.

I also think it would be less nicer if those links were named by 
functions (Add Reply To) rather than header names (Add Reply-To). While 
the three header names we had there prior to introducing Mail-* stuff 
were basically the same as the functions, I wouldn't say that about the 
two latest entries in that list.

So, instead of this list:
Add Cc | Add Bcc | Add Reply-To | Add Mail-Reply-To | Add Mail-Followup-To
I suggest this:
Add Cc | Add Bcc | Add Reply Address | Add Followup Address
or at least this:
Add Cc | Add Bcc | Add Reply-To | Add Followup-To

In my opinion, this would make RC less complicated, and I think this was 
the primary goal of RC, no?

Rimas
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/8f4f07cd

Reply via email to