On 2012-02-11 17:43, Cor Bosman wrote: >> >> We would indeed be running gitorious for Thomas, so that he could >> administer the users / ssh keys allowed to push to such-and-such >> branches himself. > > So does that mean only specific people can use the interface? >
gitorious - if that's what Thomas wants, and he's making the decisions around here ;-) - allows git:// just as much as ssh:// (in the git@host:repo.git fashion), and granular control to committing to branches (stable vs. development vs. topic branches vs. etc.). The web interface though, which is what you are talking about, is where the features are. It uses a different push url to push out a patch for review, essentially creating a new working copy of the repository on the server. Public (anonymous) and/or private (authenticated) access being provided -should Thomas want either or both- is not the issue. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com t: +44 144 340 9500 m: +44 74 2516 3817 w: http://www.kolabsys.com pgp: 9342 BF08 _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/ BT/8f4f07cd
