Reason behind this that with [email protected], the MTA will try to get MX records for the 'dns name' 127.0.0.1. (Although, I hope all MTA's are smart enough to just reject such an address) With [172.0.0.1] it bypasses MX checks and uses the default A or CNAME DNS record or, in case of an IP address, the IP.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Den 2012-08-23 20:15, A.L.E.C skrev: > > On 08/23/2012 07:43 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> >>> Den 2012-08-23 08:06, A.L.E.C skrev: >>> >>> Doesn't work with current version too. It looks like javascript method >>>> for address validation doesn't handle this case. Please, open a ticket >>>> in bugtracker, so we could fix this issue in next version. >>>> >>> >> I've fixed this issue in commit ff805351cae78676927f76a1960b8e** >> 688558fe95. >> > > also here i forget to say that [email protected] is invalid, but > abuse@[127.0.0.1] > is valid > > test it on mta such as postfix to prove it :=) > > thanks for all that resolve this > > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Roundcube Development discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.roundcube.net/**mailman/listinfo/dev<http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev> >
_______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
