On 09-09-12 20:30, Thomas Bruederli wrote: > You now propose to expand everything on one click and smash a shitload > of options into a dummy user's face who just wants to add a CC line. > That's a regression and not an optimization to me.
I agree with Thomas. Users who want to add a CC or BCC should not be bothered with every possible header field. I mean, how many users do use Followup-To on a regular basis? I like the old design better. > As a side note, the two-step header expansion in message (pre)view > isn't perfect either. I was confused by the up/down arrows appearing > when I expanded the headers in message preview. Showing all headers is > again a very power-user feature and should not use the same element as > to just show the regular headers. And there's no way to hide them > anymore. Furthermore, I don't exactly understand why in full message > view mode the headers are collapsed by default. There we have enough > space and all basic headers should be show right away. The reason to > hide them in preview mode was because they're redundant to what is > displayed in the message list above and vertical space is limited. I figure that Reply-To can be an useful addition to the headers shown in the message preview; as users may reply directly from the message preview pane without opening the full message. When the Reply-to is displayed in the message preview pane, an user can already see that his reply will be sent to another e-mail address. Cheers, Geert _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
