On 12/02/2012 12:13 AM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: >>> So what is true? Is "RFC 2047/2231" Outlook's (as the UI says) or >>> Thunderbird's (as the config says) default? And what is the best option in >>> terms of backwards compatibility...? >> >> Both are true. > > Both can't be true, as they contradict each other. > >> It just Thunderbird's default is what works with Outlook ;) > > If "1" (which is RFC2047/2231 aka "MS Outlook") is Thunderbird's default, > then "Full RFC 2231 (Thunderbird)" can neither be true nor does it make any > sense to me.
But you taken into consideration a possibility that this is true even if you don't understand it? >>> Furthermore, this really shouldn't be a user-configurable option. RFC >>> 2047/2231 are way too complex and hard to understand for an end-user. This >>> should be set server-side only. I'm wondering how this option could make it >>> into the UI. >> >> There was once a "advanced" switch, and this option was hidden by >> default. Then the switch disapeared. > > All of a sudden...? Or did somebody make it disappear? And if so, why? If I remember there was only one "advanced" option, so it has not make sense to hide it, if you need more info, search commit logs. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl] Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net] --------------------------------------------------- PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
