On 03/16/2013 10:57 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: > 1) It seems to be stored somewhere which part had lastly been viewed for a > particular message, am I seeing this correct...? And if so, how and where is > this (safely) being stored? I'm wondering if RC shouldn't first and always > display the part according to the setting "Display HTML" under "Displaying > Messages" after selecting back and forth between messages (would look more > consistent to me)?
It is stored in session per-every message separately. So, when a message is displayed, last setting for this message is used, if the switch on that particular message wasn't used yet, default setting will be used. > 3) But: Viewing the Text part, there is still the well-known link "HTML > message" below the header. Viewing the HTML part, opposed to this there is > (still) no correspondent link "Text message" below the header. Anyway, the > still existing link "HTML message" is sort of redundant to the toggle at the > right of the subject header. This should be more consistent (either showing > an additional link below the header always or never, no matter which part is > being viewed). > > I would prefer a link below the header ONLY anyway (as the icon at the > right of the subject header is hard to detect and the text "HTML message" or > "Text message" is more user-friendly, better visible and better > understandable than those - pretty small - icons). Alternatively, both > toggles should exist. The least solution from my point of view would be to > have JUST these icons. I just keeped the old behaviour of converting HTML part to the attachment when displaying a message in text mode. I'm not sure we should change that. You can create a ticket, we'll think about this. Also, in my opinion icons are better, than links on attachments list. > 4) There is a problem when I'm viewing the Text part and click on the above > mentioned and still existing link "HTML message" below the header: The HTML > part is being displayed, but the display of the header disappears entirely > (see screenshot comparison attached). I'm unable to reproduce (even with IE8). That link should open a new window/tab with HTML part (attachment) preview. There's a javascript error in this new page, but that's another issue. > 5) At a first quick test, it seems that a reply does quote the part which > is currently being viewed. Is this correct and intentional? If so: Great! Yes. It's intentional. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl] Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net] --------------------------------------------------- PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
