Am 09.05.2013 19:45, schrieb A.L.E.C: > On 05/08/2013 09:31 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote:
>> Any response welcome and appreciated. > > Looks like another issue. Fixed in git. Saw the commit already, but didn't do a git-pull yet. Apparently only the display has been fixed, so the quoting is correct? Sure...? Still not sure what the design/logic is. Currently 1.0-git does re-wrap quoted paragraphs (at least in particular cases), ist that by design? And in which cases does/should that happen? > I've found next issue, which is a designed behaviour (to prevent other > issues), but doesn't look good to me now. When we reply to a > format=flowed message with very long paragraphs the whole (quoted) > paragraph is a one long line. Right! And BTW: Is the blank at the end of line of any importance/meaning in quoted paragraphs? Another question also is if there should be a difference in the design in these four scenarios: 1) Original message non-flowed, reply non-flowed 2) Original message flowed, reply non-flowed 3) Original message non-flowed, reply flowed 4) Original message flowed, reply flowed Cheers, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
