So you're saying a clean commit history is more important than giving me proper credit where it is due? Again, that is not acceptable. Besides - why is the commit history that important to begin with?
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:06 PM, A.L.E.C <[email protected]> wrote: > On 09/18/2013 11:47 AM, David Deutsch wrote: > > As for the "last thing" - Yeah that's not acceptable to me. Erasing the > > history of how I did my work obfuscates my contribution and I would find > > that rather insulting. I'm happy to contribute and I'm happy to bend my > > contribution to your specifications. But come on, man, don't mess with > the > > karma aspect of it. > > Come on. The first PR has ca. 60 commits. This will make commit history > fucked up seriously. I will not merge such PR. I expect other code-style > PRs to have 10-20 commits, this is still too much. > > -- > Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak > LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl] > Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net] > --------------------------------------------------- > PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl > _______________________________________________ > Roundcube Development discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
