Am 22.11.2013 10:47, schrieb Thomas Bruederli: > A.L.E.C wrote: >> On 11/22/2013 09:52 AM, Thomas Bruederli wrote: >> >>> I don't agree. Colored text on dark background is less readable than black >>> on white. The larger font is supposed to compensate that which it IMO does. >> >> I do not think the text is less readable, but if so maybe make it more >> brighter. > > Making them brighter will result in pastel colors which I don't really > consider adorable. But that's probably a matter of personal taste. >> >>> And what are "some small improvements"? >> >> well, I'd like to move container few pixels to the left (so right border >> is not above other element border) > > Done. > >> and move info icon a few pixels down (it's not aligned with text). > > Done. > >> I'd also consider smaller (not much) opacity value. > > I'm using the opacity value from your jsfiddle ;-) > By smaller you mean less opaque and more transparent? That would again > reduce readability...
28 messages already about colors, pixels, opacity, transparency, brightness, font size - I'd wish I'd have your problems... (in German: "Eure Probleme möchte ich haben..."). Is anyone still open to a discussion about the more technical side of things? E.g. indicating attachments in the message list of multipart/alternative messages with a nested multipart/mixed part? Or "least invasive" charset declarations (e.g. declaring "US-ASCII" or "ISO-8859-1" rather than "UTF-8" if "US-ASCII" or "ISO-8859-1" would be "just enough" - and yes, I know that "UTF-8" is always correct)? Cheers and <sigh>, -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
