> On 24.02.2016, at 08:02, A.L.E.C <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 02/23/2016 09:12 PM, Thomas Bruederli wrote: >> Anyway, please raise your voice with suggestions, concerns or offers >> if you have experience with such a post-Trac situation. > > We put ticket IDs in code comments and I found myself from time to time > reading the old tickets to understand better the idea behind the > specific code part. > > So, it would be really nice if we migrate all fixed tickets e.g. putting > their old ID in subject line so we can search them.
Good point! The migration script I was playing around would add a reference to the old ticket ID into the ticket body. Turns out githubs search function also captures that. So finding closed issues by their old ID is possible. > If we don't migrate open tickets, a read-only copy of trac online for > some time would be also nice, so we could simply select the open tickets > we think are important and move them manually to github. Migrating open tickets is the primary goal. For finding references to old tickets, running Trac in read-only mode could be an idea. Or we maintain a simple web service redirecting old trac ticket urls to the new github issues using an ID map generated during migration. ~Thomas _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
