Hello Eric, Le jeudi 07 avril 2016 à 22:48 +0200, Eric Dubois a écrit : > I suspect that a beta cycle is not enough and that some toolbox developers or > other users are not > aware of this coming change. Once again this is much shorter than previous > changes, which were > handled much more smoothly by the Scilab team... Why still shorten the > adaptation time? Except to > mark the difference with the predecessors?
Hmm after questioning myself, I think that is due to the Scilab 6.0.0 major version nature. We want to push the better into it before the release. I guess the next iteration to 6.1 will be much more focused on new features (added functions) and without existing behavior modification. > Happy to see that at least (and at last) someone does not find compelling the > case of changing > this behaviour. Samuel is not the only one, I am also quiet conservative and my question is only about warning on valid code :). > By the way I have spent something like 2 weeks modifying my code and, even if > I hope having found > most of the concerned cases, I am sure not to have found all... and like > Samuel the resulting code > is sometimes less clean than before. And I, have been obliged to stop ongoing > developments to do > this stuff, which is from my point of view a bad oiutcome. That's exactly the needed information I requested ! Thanks for writing me that you need more than a beta cycle to migrate your code. Probably other users will also need some time to notice the change and migrate. -- Clément _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
