Hi Martin, That's probably a repack of your scilab binary so not official :) .
After some reading on AppImage it is really similar to our current tar.gz executable version so after our minimal platform upgrade we might switch to it. Could you file a bug with detailed description of your need (basically why the current executable version is not suitable for you and AppImage is much better) ? Thanks, -- Clément Le mardi 14 février 2017 à 20:52 +0100, Martin Marmsoler a écrit : > Hello, > > I found on this link: https://bintray.com/probono/AppImages/Scilab an > AppImage package. Is this an > official AppImage or generated by someone? I tried it out and it works fine :) > > Best regards, > > Martin > > 2017-02-01 11:06 GMT+01:00 Martin Marmsoler <[email protected]>: > > ok I understand what you mean. Thank you for you explanation!. > > > > Martin > > > > On Jan 31, 2017 18:28, "Clément David" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Martin, > > > > > > Le mardi 31 janvier 2017 à 07:21 -0700, Murmele a écrit : > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I would like to ask if there already exist a flatpak or appimage > > > > package for > > > > scilab or if there is a plan to build one? > > > > > > Currently there is no plan to do so as the scilab binary is working well > > > on Linux. > > > > > > I though about making a flatpack based on org.freedesktop.Platform some > > > months ago but the > > > hard task > > > is to rebuild Scilab dependencies on the restricted env. to be > > > consistent. AFAIK there is also > > > no > > > flatpak runtime for OpenJDK/JRE. > > > > > > -- > > > Clément > > > _______________________________________________ > > > dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
