On 10/21/2013 05:13 PM, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
It was <2013-10-18 pią 20:16>, when Stéphane Desneux wrote:
----
Conclusion: stripping the binaries has a great impact:
- smaller image size: faster to load from storage,
AFAIK this is not true. Linker does not read(2) libraries, it mmap(2)s
them and accesses only the parts it needs. This is how shareing the code
works. This might be true if you do some kind of prefetch or something.
I agreed with Lukasz's opinion.
IIRC, default EFL linker script does not map the debug section even
though '-g' option is used.
So there is no big difference between stripped and non-stripped binaries.
BTW, how about use '-static' option in case of some critical preloaded app?
The binary size might be little bit bigger then stripped one,
but static linked binaries are tend to slightly faster startup times
then dynamic linked one.
Sangjung
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
