On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:16:13AM +0100, Jacek Bukarewicz wrote: > On 11/05/2013 10:41 AM, Zhu, Peter J wrote: > >Hi, > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > >>Behalf Of ANUJ MISHRA > >>Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 1:57 PM > >>To: Liu, Bing Wei; Saxena, Sunil; Lynch, Rusty; Michael Kim > >>Cc: Tizen Dev > >>Subject: Re: [Dev] Notes of 3.0 Trunk taskforce meeting (Nov 5th) > >> > >>Update about #1: > >>-By tomorrow all applications will be updated by Mr. Taeyun An from Samsung > >>at /apps/native/preloaded git path provided he does not face any critical > >>issue. > >> > >>BR, > >>Anuj > >> > >BTW, Is the image @ > >https://download.tizen.org/snapshots/tizen/rd-pq/latest/images/RD-PQ/ > >bootable in M0 or any Samsung reference device? > > > >Thanks, > >Peter > > > > > Hi, > > I tried this image a few days ago on m0 and it didn't boot (I'm > downloading most recent version now but I suspect it won't boot > either). > Problem with the image is that it lacks /sbin/init or files in other > standard locations expected by kernel (/etc/init, /bin/init, > /bin/sh). > This is caused by filesystem package installation failure (it's > installed too late and some previous package had already created > directory or symlink that filesystem package was supposed to > install). As a result there are no /sbin/ -> /usr/sbin/ nor /bin/ -> > /usr/bin symlinks. This also means that there is /usr/sbin/init file > but no /sbin/init. > I've pushed a fix for the review [1]. It's set as verified and got > +2, but it's still not merged. It simply removes prepackages section > as it seems to mess things up and I don't see benefits of keeping it > (but I might be wrong). Please note that intel mobile package does > not contain prepackages section. > Alternatively filesystem package should be included in the > prepackages - probably at the beginning so it's installed first. > When prepackages section is removed from the .ks file I'm able to at > least boot to the console. Systemd starts its services and it looks > like many problems reported for intel image exist for ARM as well, > which is expected. > Currently I see these services failing: > > avsystem.service loaded failed failed > boot-osp.service loaded failed failed > gstreamer.service loaded failed failed > vconf-setup.service loaded failed failed > > X Server is not started.
Seems even worse than PR3 image, for general blocker issue, see https://bugs.tizen.org/jira/browse/PTREL-131 -- Thanks, Chengwei > > [1] https://review.tizen.org/gerrit/#/c/11478/ > > Regards, > > -- > Jacek Bukarewicz > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
