It was <2013-12-13 pią 12:14>, when Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 11:43 +0100, Karol Lewandowski wrote: >> On 12/12/2013 01:47 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> > Did you check this rather old text Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt >> > (https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt) >> > >> > What have changed since time (early 2000 I guess) and why the internal >> > stable API stopped being "nonsense"? >> >> Nothing has changed but this is not really related. >> >> What we want to accomplish here is to provide guarantee that kernel >> package with given version provides well defined ("stable") API/ABI. >> >> We need this information to know when we really _need_ to rebuild >> packages with out-of-tree modules. > > Why not to just rebuilt them every time the kernel package changes, I > wonder? Do you have hundreds of them out-of-tree modules?
It isn't about our modules, they can be rebuilt with OBS, but rather about third party ones used/provided by OEMs outside of Tizen repositories. -- Łukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
pgpfJDLswJFwV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
