On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Peters, Brad T <[email protected]> wrote: > The thing to realize here is that Tizen is a bare-metal application > environment - and this is a GOOD thing. We get major performance > improvements and improved native interaction based on the full native C and > C++ API's. The idea of a Sandbox, at least as it exists in the Android JVM, > is not supported. The closest comparison would be for HTML5 apps running in > the Web Runtime.
This is what I mean when I say sandbox is a misused term. It means different things in different contexts and to different people. > Tizen native apps are equivalent to system-level apps in that they all have > PID's and are true processes. The BIG difference is that, in Tizen, we have > SMACK and SystemD to limit and throttle what these processes can do, as well > as top-to-bottom source-code review of all vendor supplied Apps. Review is not a replacement for security mechanisms. Cheers -- Michael Leibowitz _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
