Hello Sangyoon Good catch! indeed there are some mistakes.
There is no clear naming conventio, what do you propose? Of course, it is never late for fixing what you are pointing on. Thanks 2015-01-07 12:10 GMT+01:00 장상윤 <[email protected]>: > Dear Baptiste and other application framework's maintainersm, > > > > I would like to ask about naming convention of multi-user related APIs of > application framework. > > There is unlikely consistent naming convention for it. > > For instance, in the "slp-pkgmgr" repository, there are two APIs as below: > > A) > int pkgmgr_client_usr_activate_app(pkgmgr_client *pc, const char *appid, > uid_t uid) > > B) > int pkgmgr_pkginfo_get_usr_pkginfo(const char *pkgid, uid_t > uid,pkgmgr_pkginfo_h *handle); > > > > The thing is that A added "_usr_" before verb, "activate", but B added > "_usr_" after verb, "get" > > > > Does anybody clarify and fix it? > > Is it too late to fix it? > > > > Thanks, > > Best regards, > > > > Sangyoon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev > > -- Baptiste DURAND Eurogiciel Vannes/FR
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
