Hi Boram,

Good to know that you have interest into this.



> On 11/06/2015 10:18 AM, Boram Park wrote:
>
>> Hi wayland and weston guys
>>
>> Last spring, I and Eurogiciel had upgraded wayland to 1.7.0. Now I have
>> plan to upgrade wayland to upper version(1.8.0 or 1.9.0).
>>
>
QtWayland supports 1.8.0 , unsure about 1.9.0 , need to check it


Before doing that, I'd like to check two things.
>>
>> - Is it fine to upgrade wayland only?
>>
>
It's ok for me make sure all downstream patches will apply too



> - Is there someone who can upgrade qtwayland to 5.5.1 for upgrading weston
>> to 1.8.0?
>>
>
I think I am granted to but , Let's see what is the plan with qt4tizen ,
Tom ? ..

IMHO, It would make sense to maintain upcoming Qt LTS version 5.6

Because It has my changes in , then no need to maintain xdg-shell support
tizen side.:

http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwayland.git/commit/?id=c6dc4f473518d4a739445a66858115309507797e


>
>> It looks wayland can be upgraded without any other modules upgrade.
>>
>
We could try that



> To upgrade weston also, I guess we should upgrade qtwayland together.
>> qtwayland now uses weston 1.6.0 xdg-shell.xml.
>
>
maybe we could try that into the devel project of OBS 1st ?
And wait Tizen:Common to be released again in continuous integration mode ?



But upstream qtwayland uses weston 1.8.0 xdg-shell.xml.
>> If someone can upgrade qtwayland to 5.5.1, then I think we can upgrade
>> wayland to 1.9.0(also 18.0 possible) and weston to 1.8.0.
>>
>
Since you're investigated this maybe you can share branches in sandbox ...
and file a report to track this transition.
then I will be be granted to submit them ? is it a good plan ?
(but I would prefer to wait a Tizen:Common continuous releases to be back)


On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Boram Park <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I realize that dev and 5.6 branch of qtwayland which are still in
> developing status have weston 1.8.0 xdg-shell.xml.
>


That version has been released :
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwayland.git/tag/?h=v5.6.0-alpha1



> Instead of upgrading qtwayland, maybe it can be alternative to cherry-pick
> the below commit only from qtwayland dev branch to tizen branch.
>
> commit c6dc4f473518d4a739445a66858115309507797e
>

IIRC, it would not apply without some adaptation.


Hope this help, Regards


-- 
https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/User:Pcoval
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to