Thank you for this proposal and your work. Looking forward to it. Thanks, Marco
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, 07:27 Yiheng Wang, <yihe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All > > Thanks for participating in the vote. Here's the result: > +1 (binding) > ajbozarth > zjffdu > mgaido91 > jerryshao > > +1 (no-binding) > 5 > > The vote passes. I will create subtasks for it. > > Thanks > Yiheng > > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:30 AM Yiheng Wang <yihe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear Community > > > > I'd like to call a vote on LIVY-718 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LIVY/issues/LIVY-718> "Support > > multi-active high availability in Livy". > > > > Currently, Livy only supports single node recovery. This is not > sufficient > > in some production environments. In our scenario, the Livy server serves > > many notebook and JDBC services. We want to make Livy service more > > fault-tolerant and scalable. > > > > There're already some proposals in the community for high availability. > > But they're not so complete or just for active-standby high availability. > > So we propose a multi-active high availability design to achieve the > > following goals: > > > > - One or more servers will serve the client requests at the same time. > > - Sessions are allocated among different servers. > > - When one node crashes, the affected sessions will be moved to other > > active services. > > > > Please find the design doc here > > < > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bD3qYZpw14_NuCcSGUOfqQ0pqvSbCQsOLFuZp26Ohjc/edit?usp=sharing > >, > > which has been reviewed for several weeks. > > > > This vote is open until next Wednesday (Dec. 18). > > > > [] +1: Accept the proposal > > [] +0 > > [] -1: I don't think this is a good idea because ... > > > > Thank you > > > > Yiheng > > >
