[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16005133#comment-16005133
 ] 

Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1389:
--------------------------------------

We are working toward having an SPI package that defines what is really public 
in log4j-core.  That should help with these kinds of issue. I'd like us to work 
toward the SPI first but we do not have a schedule yet.

> Jackson Layout classes private
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1389
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1389
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Question
>          Components: Layouts
>    Affects Versions: 2.5
>            Reporter: Roland Jungnickel
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I was wondering why the Jackson Layout classes like  
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/master/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/layout/JacksonFactory.java
>  or 
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/master/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/layout/AbstractJacksonLayout.java
>  are private. This makes extending them in other projects very hard.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to