I’m not sure how to make it be any better than this. Although the Java 9 classes could be removed we would just have to put them back in a couple of months when Java 9 is released. Putting them in a separate module is not a great option as that will require an additional jar to run in Java 9.
Ralph > On May 21, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Mikael Ståldal <mik...@staldal.nu> wrote: > > Same with IntelliJ IDEA. You can set JRE per module (such as log4j-api, > log4j-core), but not per source folder. > > So this is not enough to fix it. But it is better than nothing, so please > keep it. And do the same for tests if/when we add any tests for the code in > src/main/java9. > > I am now able to continue to work with the project in IntelliJ IDEA by > excluding src/main/java9. (But if I work with the Java 9 stuff, I only have a > text editor with syntax highlighting, no other IDE support for that part.) > > > On 2017-05-21 14:50, Gary Gregory wrote: >> I set the JRE for that project to Java 9. I do not think you can set the >> JRE per source folder, only per project. >> Gary >> On May 21, 2017 1:29 AM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >> I’ve modified the build to put the Java 9 classes of the API into a >> separate source directory. Can you see if that helps things in Eclipse? >> Ralph >
