I'm happy to let you know that I've finished rewriting the rc tags. The tags look well organized now.
2017-05-24 18:43 GMT+02:00 Dominik Psenner <[email protected]>: > > > On 24 May 2017 6:09 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2017-05-24, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > > Sorry, that mail was semantically wrong. It was obviously too late in the > > evening when i wrote it. :-) I originally meant this: > > ref? I think you mean rel. Maybe it hasn't been too late after all? ;-) > > > *facepalm and laughing* .. rel/ .. > > For consistency I'll move the last remaining release tag also to rel/ but > without signing it. > > > > Do we want to remove all non ref/ tags that have a ref/ tag? And further, > > do we want to move the rc tags to rc/x.y.z.f-RCx? > > Re: non-rel Tags, what I said below. I don't care much. > > rc/* is a nice idea for future tags. > > > Then I'll move the x.y.z-RC tags to rc/x.y.z-RC and sign them later today. > Further I'll hack on the release instructions. > > > Stefan > > > On 24 May 2017 3:19 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 2017-05-23, Dominik Psenner wrote: > > >>> I just noticed that we have several rel/tags in our repository. Thanks > >>> Stefan for crafting those pgp signed immutable tags. > > >> rel/* is protected in our git repos, so we are encouraged to use them > >> for release tags. > > >>> Do we want to avoid duplication and remove the tags that have no rel/ > >>> prefix? > > >> I don't care much. The tags before 1.2.11 have been created by somebody > >> else than me so removing them feels a bit like re-writing history, but > >> only a bit. > > >> Stefan > > > -- Dominik Psenner
