Rats. Substitute “no plans” with “only plans”. Ralph
> On Mar 8, 2020, at 6:31 AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > > I have no plans to do this in master. One of the main goals of 3.0 is to be > fully modularized. This is just one part of that. > > Ralph > >> On Mar 8, 2020, at 5:26 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Is this worthy doing in 2.0? In 3 we can do whatever we want IMO. >> >> Gary >> >>>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 23:24 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: >>> >>> I started looking at log4j-core in master today with an eye towards >>> creating the module-info.java file. As I went through it I realized we >>> would have to expose almost all of the packages because we have co-mingled >>> private implementations along with public interfaces and abstract class. We >>> really can’t move the public classes as user’s are currently referencing >>> them so I am proposing that we move the private classes. I already started >>> that with LogBuilder by creating a directory named “internal” off of core. >>> Rather than having internal directories all over the place I am thinking we >>> should mimic the same existing package structure under the internal >>> directory and move private classes there. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> Ralph >>>
