Hey Ralph,

Thanks so much for taking time, really appreciated. Unfortunately the
last few days I was pretty busy both at home and at work. I will check
out your changes and reply back as soon as I find some time.

Kind regards.

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 1:08 AM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> Volkan,
>
> I have updated the relevant documentation. I am done with all the changes I 
> wanted to make.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jul 6, 2020, at 2:50 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have fixed the issue with the annotations. I have added the ability to 
> > format the message field using a pattern and I have modified the code so 
> > that specifying eventDelimiter=“null” will insert a null at the end of the 
> > message as specifying eventDelimiter=“\0” or “\u000” does not work (It ends 
> > up being “\\0” or “\u000”.
> >
> > I have verified that with these changes the message is formatted properly 
> > with Gelf. I am still testing though to see how the ThreadContext is being 
> > handled.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On Jul 5, 2020, at 11:01 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> I finally got some time to start testing JsonTemplateLayout against the 
> >> logging in the cloud documentation. The first problem I ran into is that 
> >> additional fields don’t work. I don’t see any configurations that have 
> >> them and the Builder doesn’t have annotations on the key and value fields 
> >> so I suspect it just doesn’t work.  Why didn’t you just enhance 
> >> KeyValuePair to add the type attribute?
> >>
> >> After I corrected the EventTemplateAdditionalField plugin I still can’t 
> >> get stack traces the way I want them. I thought you said you added the 
> >> ability to format the message using a pattern, but I don’t see that in the 
> >> documentation or in MessageResolver. Was that not included? As I said, I 
> >> require the stack trace to print in the message field in Kibana, not just 
> >> be a key in the additional data.
> >>
> >>
> >> Ralph
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to