I have updated the logging services site and corrected log4net’s .htaccess file 
to point to the 2.0.9 release. However, I cannot seem to get the download page 
to reference 2.0.9. It still shows 2.0.8.  The release notes are correct though.

Ralph

> On Aug 28, 2020, at 7:38 AM, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -d
> 
> On 2020/08/28 16:07:45, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> I will take care of the main logging site. It currently uses the ASF CMS but 
> we have to get off of it so there isn’t much point in you having to learn how 
> to deal with it.
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Aug 28, 2020, at 12:26 AM, Davyd McColl wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all
>> 
>> I've been trying to update content for http://logging.apache.org/log4net (in 
>> particular http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release) and I'm sure I'm just 
>> doing something silly or missing something.
>> 
>> I've followed instructions at 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LOGGING/Managing+the+Logging+Services+Web+Site
>>  up to point 7, which is where I'm stuck: I'm not sure where to find the 
>> mentioned index.twig, mainly because I'm not sure what the document is 
>> referring to with "main web site". I haven't found an index.twig in 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/logging/content/ or 
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/site/cms/trunk, but it's wholly 
>> possible I'm just missing it. Or that neither of these is the correct place 
>> to look.
>> 
>> I have updated documentation and committed via SVN for 2.0.9, including 
>> updating the 2.x link. I haven't marked the project as "not dormant" (yet -- 
>> I'll be more confident to do so once I've seen a complete release with all 
>> the entailed bits, including this site, so that I have some semblance of 
>> confidence to do it again!). All I've done is update the release notes to 
>> include the changes for 2.0.9, which I'm sure some people might appreciate, 
>> minor though the changes may be.
>> 
>> Any assistance appreciated. I've already received much assistance from Ralph 
>> and Matt (thanks!).
>> 
>> -d
> 
> 


Reply via email to