Could this be a firewall configuration issue? Matt Sicker
> On Oct 27, 2021, at 11:52, Bob Kirnum <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am concerned that something may have changed on my system not directly > related to the Monterey upgrade. We normally just use the dynamic library, > I only built it now in order to help debug the issue. I was getting the > same segmentation fault prior to building from source. > > Just ran the unit tests, all but one passes. > > make test > Running tests... > Test project /Users/bkirnum/Documents/GitHub/logging-log4cxx/build > Start 1: asyncappendertestcase > 1/62 Test #1: asyncappendertestcase .................. Passed 23.82 > sec > Start 2: consoleappendertestcase > 2/62 Test #2: consoleappendertestcase ................ Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 3: decodingtest > 3/62 Test #3: decodingtest ........................... Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 4: encodingtest > 4/62 Test #4: encodingtest ........................... Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 5: fileappendertest > 5/62 Test #5: fileappendertest ....................... Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 6: filetestcase > 6/62 Test #6: filetestcase ........................... Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 7: hierarchytest > 7/62 Test #7: hierarchytest .......................... Passed 0.07 > sec > Start 8: hierarchythresholdtestcase > 8/62 Test #8: hierarchythresholdtestcase ............. Passed 0.09 > sec > Start 9: jsonlayouttest > 9/62 Test #9: jsonlayouttest ......................... Passed 0.10 > sec > Start 10: l7dtestcase > 10/62 Test #10: l7dtestcase ............................ Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 11: leveltestcase > 11/62 Test #11: leveltestcase .......................... Passed 0.07 > sec > Start 12: loggertestcase > 12/62 Test #12: loggertestcase ......................... Passed 0.19 > sec > Start 13: mdctestcase > 13/62 Test #13: mdctestcase ............................ Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 14: minimumtestcase > 14/62 Test #14: minimumtestcase ........................ Passed 0.10 > sec > Start 15: ndctestcase > 15/62 Test #15: ndctestcase ............................ Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 16: patternlayouttest > 16/62 Test #16: patternlayouttest ...................... Passed 0.14 > sec > Start 17: propertyconfiguratortest > 17/62 Test #17: propertyconfiguratortest ............... Passed 0.28 > sec > Start 18: rollingfileappendertestcase > 18/62 Test #18: rollingfileappendertestcase ............ Passed 0.10 > sec > Start 19: streamtestcase > 19/62 Test #19: streamtestcase ......................... Passed 2.32 > sec > Start 20: multithreadtest > 20/62 Test #20: multithreadtest ........................ Passed 0.26 > sec > Start 21: absolutetimedateformattestcase > 21/62 Test #21: absolutetimedateformattestcase ......... Passed 0.07 > sec > Start 22: cacheddateformattestcase > 22/62 Test #22: cacheddateformattestcase ............... Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 23: casttestcase > 23/62 Test #23: casttestcase ........................... Passed 0.07 > sec > Start 24: charsetdecodertestcase > 24/62 Test #24: charsetdecodertestcase ................. Passed 0.07 > sec > Start 25: charsetencodertestcase > 25/62 Test #25: charsetencodertestcase ................. Passed 0.20 > sec > Start 26: cyclicbuffertestcase > 26/62 Test #26: cyclicbuffertestcase ................... Passed 0.12 > sec > Start 27: datetimedateformattestcase > 27/62 Test #27: datetimedateformattestcase ............. Passed 0.16 > sec > Start 28: filewatchdogtest > 28/62 Test #28: filewatchdogtest ....................... Passed 0.13 > sec > Start 29: inetaddresstestcase > 29/62 Test #29: inetaddresstestcase .................... Passed 0.13 > sec > Start 30: iso8601dateformattestcase > 30/62 Test #30: iso8601dateformattestcase .............. Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 31: messagebuffertest > 31/62 Test #31: messagebuffertest ...................... Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 32: optionconvertertestcase > 32/62 Test #32: optionconvertertestcase ................ Passed 0.10 > sec > Start 33: propertiestestcase > 33/62 Test #33: propertiestestcase ..................... Passed 0.15 > sec > Start 34: relativetimedateformattestcase > 34/62 Test #34: relativetimedateformattestcase ......... Passed 0.07 > sec > Start 35: stringhelpertestcase > 35/62 Test #35: stringhelpertestcase ................... Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 36: stringtokenizertestcase > 36/62 Test #36: stringtokenizertestcase ................ Passed 0.07 > sec > Start 37: syslogwritertest > 37/62 Test #37: syslogwritertest ....................... Passed 0.11 > sec > Start 38: timezonetestcase > 38/62 Test #38: timezonetestcase ....................... Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 39: transcodertestcase > 39/62 Test #39: transcodertestcase ..................... Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 40: threadutilitytestcase > 40/62 Test #40: threadutilitytestcase .................. Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 41: xloggertestcase > 41/62 Test #41: xloggertestcase ........................ Passed 0.09 > sec > Start 42: defaultinittestcase > 42/62 Test #42: defaultinittestcase .................... Passed 0.10 > sec > Start 43: filtertests > 43/62 Test #43: filtertests ............................ Passed 0.10 > sec > Start 44: socketappendertestcase > 44/62 Test #44: socketappendertestcase ................. Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 45: sockethubappendertestcase > 45/62 Test #45: sockethubappendertestcase .............. Passed 2.08 > sec > Start 46: syslogappendertestcase > 46/62 Test #46: syslogappendertestcase ................. Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 47: telnetappendertestcase > 47/62 Test #47: telnetappendertestcase ................. Passed 2.08 > sec > Start 48: xmlsocketappendertestcase > 48/62 Test #48: xmlsocketappendertestcase .............. Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 49: socketservertestcase > 49/62 Test #49: socketservertestcase ...................***Failed 13.20 > sec > Start 50: patternparsertestcase > 50/62 Test #50: patternparsertestcase .................. Passed 0.09 > sec > Start 51: filenamepatterntestcase > 51/62 Test #51: filenamepatterntestcase ................ Passed 0.08 > sec > Start 52: filterbasedrollingtest > 52/62 Test #52: filterbasedrollingtest ................. Passed 0.10 > sec > Start 53: manualrollingtest > 53/62 Test #53: manualrollingtest ...................... Passed 0.09 > sec > Start 54: obsoletedailyrollingfileappendertest > 54/62 Test #54: obsoletedailyrollingfileappendertest ... Passed 5.19 > sec > Start 55: obsoleterollingfileappendertest > 55/62 Test #55: obsoleterollingfileappendertest ........ Passed 5.20 > sec > Start 56: sizebasedrollingtest > 56/62 Test #56: sizebasedrollingtest ................... Passed 0.14 > sec > Start 57: timebasedrollingtest > 57/62 Test #57: timebasedrollingtest ................... Passed 27.70 > sec > Start 58: spitestcase > 58/62 Test #58: spitestcase ............................ Passed 0.09 > sec > Start 59: errorhandlertestcase > 59/62 Test #59: errorhandlertestcase ................... Passed 0.09 > sec > Start 60: levelmatchfiltertestcase > 60/62 Test #60: levelmatchfiltertestcase ............... Passed 0.09 > sec > Start 61: levelrangefiltertestcase > 61/62 Test #61: levelrangefiltertestcase ............... Passed 0.09 > sec > Start 62: xmltests > 62/62 Test #62: xmltests ............................... Passed 0.14 > sec > > 98% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 62 > > Total Test time (real) = 87.22 sec > > The following tests FAILED: > 49 - socketservertestcase (Failed) > Errors while running CTest > Output from these tests are in: > /Users/bkirnum/Documents/GitHub/logging-log4cxx/build/Testing/Temporary/LastTest.log > Use "--rerun-failed --output-on-failure" to re-run the failed cases > verbosely. > make: *** [test] Error 8 > >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:35 PM Robert Middleton <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Bob, >> >> I don't use MacOS, so I don't know why that would happen. Builds on >> MacOS through github actions are ok(but that is using 10.15). >> Assuming that your stack trace is correct, it's complaining about line >> 159 in class.cpp, which is just 'return true'. >> >> Are you able to run the unit tests at all? >> >> -Robert Middleton >> >>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 11:49 AM Bob Kirnum <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Running application dynamically linked with log4cxx started crashing >> after >>> upgrading MacOs to Monterey. I tried building a debug version from >> source >>> but get the same error. Back trace shown below. Looks like something is >>> missing in the environment but there are no cmake or build errors. Any >>> suggestions? I'd rather not have to downgrade back to Big Sur as it >> would >>> require erasing my MacBook. >>> >>> >>> (lldb) bt >>> * thread #1, stop reason = signal SIGSTOP >>> * frame #0: 0x0000000000000000 >>> frame #1: 0x0000000113f3bd4d >>> >> liblog4cxx.12.dylib`log4cxx::helpers::Class::registerClass(newClass=0x00000001140db358) >>> at class.cpp:159:2 >>> frame #2: 0x0000000113f4034b >>> >> liblog4cxx.12.dylib`log4cxx::helpers::ClassRegistration::ClassRegistration(this=0x00000001140db368, >>> >> accessor=(liblog4cxx.12.dylib`log4cxx::pattern::ClassNamePatternConverter::getStaticClass() >>> at classnamepatternconverter.cpp:32))()) at classregistration.cpp:26:2 >>> frame #3: 0x0000000113f4037d >>> >> liblog4cxx.12.dylib`log4cxx::helpers::ClassRegistration::ClassRegistration(this=0x00000001140db368, >>> >> accessor=(liblog4cxx.12.dylib`log4cxx::pattern::ClassNamePatternConverter::getStaticClass() >>> at classnamepatternconverter.cpp:32))()) at classregistration.cpp:25:1 >>> frame #4: 0x0000000113f3e83d >>> >> liblog4cxx.12.dylib`log4cxx::pattern::ClassNamePatternConverter::registerClass() >>> at classnamepatternconverter.cpp:32:1 >>> frame #5: 0x0000000113f40309 >>> liblog4cxx.12.dylib`::__cxx_global_var_init() at >>> classnamepatternconverter.cpp:32:1 >>> frame #6: 0x0000000113f40329 >>> liblog4cxx.12.dylib`_GLOBAL__sub_I_classnamepatternconverter.cpp at >>> classnamepatternconverter.cpp:0 >>> frame #7: 0x000000011e9e2b49 dyld`invocation function for block in >>> dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) const + >> 182 >>> frame #8: 0x000000011ea0929b dyld`invocation function for block in >>> dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(Diagnostics&, >>> dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::VMAddrConverter const&, void (unsigned int) >>> block_pointer, void const*) const + 242 >>> frame #9: 0x000000011ea00893 dyld`invocation function for block in >>> dyld3::MachOFile::forEachSection(void (dyld3::MachOFile::SectionInfo >>> const&, bool, bool&) block_pointer) const + 566 >>> frame #10: 0x000000011e9cfd91 >>> dyld`dyld3::MachOFile::forEachLoadCommand(Diagnostics&, void >> (load_command >>> const*, bool&) block_pointer) const + 129 >>> frame #11: 0x000000011ea0061b >>> dyld`dyld3::MachOFile::forEachSection(void (dyld3::MachOFile::SectionInfo >>> const&, bool, bool&) block_pointer) const + 179 >>> frame #12: 0x000000011ea08df2 >>> dyld`dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::forEachInitializer(Diagnostics&, >>> dyld3::MachOAnalyzer::VMAddrConverter const&, void (unsigned int) >>> block_pointer, void const*) const + 466 >>> frame #13: 0x000000011e9e2a7c >>> dyld`dyld4::Loader::findAndRunAllInitializers(dyld4::RuntimeState&) >> const + >>> 144 >>> frame #14: 0x000000011e9e2c08 >>> dyld`dyld4::Loader::runInitializersBottomUp(dyld4::RuntimeState&, >>> dyld3::Array<dyld4::Loader const*>&) const + 178 >>> frame #15: 0x000000011e9e2beb >>> dyld`dyld4::Loader::runInitializersBottomUp(dyld4::RuntimeState&, >>> dyld3::Array<dyld4::Loader const*>&) const + 149 >>> frame #16: 0x000000011e9e2cac >>> >> dyld`dyld4::Loader::runInitializersBottomUpPlusUpwardLinks(dyld4::RuntimeState&) >>> const + 108 >>> frame #17: 0x000000011e9f632e >>> dyld`dyld4::APIs::runAllInitializersForMain() + 222 >>> frame #18: 0x000000011e9d4358 dyld`dyld4::prepare(dyld4::APIs&, >>> dyld3::MachOAnalyzer const*) + 3438 >>> frame #19: 0x000000011e9d34b4 dyld`start + 388 >>
