I'm not talking about failing tests but about some other build silliness
that does not feel necessary, for example:
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/runs/4620228443?check_suite_focus=true

Shows:


Run scacap/action-surefire-report@v1
Going to parse results form **/*-reports/TEST-*.xml
Result: 4015 tests run, 15 skipped, 0 failed.
Posting status 'completed' with conclusion 'success' to
https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/651 (sha:
06c61ddc60b24610fda694aa54f4c1dd2e29ff07)
Error: Resource not accessible by integration

Gary


On Thu, Dec 23, 2021, 10:24 Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]> wrote:

> Since, there are some tests which occasionally constantly fail, we use
> `-Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true` in `verify` goal. This causes a build
> with test failures to be marked green. The 3rd party component,
> `scacap/action-surefire-report@v1`, is used to feed these failures back
> into GitHub Actions status with some pretty printing. But since the PR is
> opened by a user who doesn't have commit rights, the 3rd party component
> fails to mark the failures due to insufficient privileges. In
> `.github/workflows/main.yml`, I had introduced the `if: github.repository
> == 'apache/logging-log4j2'` line to work around this, but apparently it is
> broken again.
>
> I totally share your frustration, same here. Though sparing time to fix
> this is pretty difficult nowadays.
>
> I also need to confess, in those brief moments of insanity, I contemplate
> nuking all those flaky tests. This will simplify the CI magic a lot and
> enhance our confidence in the tests.
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 3:10 AM Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > After getting https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/646 in what
> I
> > think is a good state, I have no idea if it is safe or not to merge
> because
> > the 1st build GitHub shows is red:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/runs/4589771553?check_suite_focus=true
> >
> > I don't use GH actions the way we do here and I'm not sure why we need
> the
> > publish test result set when anyone can just look at the build logs.
> >
> > Gary
> >
>

Reply via email to