My reasoning behind my +1 vote is that it is good to have the log4j1 repository on git, aligned with other repositories and easily available to the public.
As a starter, the repository should clearly mention its EOL and NOT provide any interactivity through issues and pull requests. -- Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find them. On Fri, Dec 24, 2021, 09:33 Volkan Yazıcı <vol...@yazi.ci> wrote: > +1 > > Goal needs to be stated in bold in a README. > Existing PRs (there are 14 as of date) need to be processed. > > This 1.x discussion took way more time then it should, IMHO. Let's take the > simplest approach and be done with it. We all agreed to not accept anything > except security fixes. Though we all know there will be incoming PRs, which > we can all do is to reject after pointing to our goal statement. > > I am not keen to keep two repos of the same project around. Making a 1.x > release is already confusing enough, having multiple repos will make things > worse. > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:35 PM Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > > In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22654 Chris Lambertus has > > recommended that we can divorce > > the read-only SVN repo from https://github.com/apache/log4j. However, it > > will not be able to keep the same > > name as all Git repos owned by the logging project must start with > > “logging-“. > > > > So this vote is to: > > 1. Delete the apache/logging-log4j1 repo I created last night. > > 2. Divorce the apache/log4j repo from SVN. > > 3. Rename apache/log4j to apache/logging-log4j1. > > 4. Create a branch named “main” from the v1_2_17 tag. > > 5. Make main the default branch in GitHub. > > > > While all votes are welcome Infra needs consensus from the PMC on this > > vote so the result will separate > > binding from non-binding votes. > > > > Ralph > > > > PS - I’ve separated this from the previous vote thread since it was > mostly > > discussion. If you want to discuss > > this please prefix the subject with [DISCUSS] >
