+1

I checked the signature and hashes and those look good.  

I unzipped the source and binaries. The appropriate license and notice files 
are present.

I did not perform tests as I don’t have the necessary tools installed.

Ralph


> On Dec 23, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Root keys are in https://downloads.apache.org/logging/KEYS which is in
> the dist repository where you commit releases.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:03 AM Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> * old-log4net.snk.gpg has been the old key to sign binaries.
>> * @Matt, where is the root logging KEYS file located?
>> 
>> The changes in the release look good to me. +1
>> 
>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 at 07:34, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks Matt
>>> 
>>> Since you've given a +1, I'll write up some sticky notes to address these
>>> points in the near future.
>>> 
>>> -d
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On December 19, 2021 23:51:45 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> Notes on the release:
>>>> * I’ve copied your release signing key to the root logging KEYS file for
>>>> easier discoverability.
>>>> * The copyright year in the NOTICE file is a few years out of date at
>>> this
>>>> point. I’ve updated this in master, though you’ll want to update this
>>> again
>>>> in a couple weeks when it’s outdated again.
>>>> * Some included files in the base directory of the source zip are
>>> missing
>>>> copyright headers or shouldn’t even be included in the tarball (e.g.,
>>> the
>>>> appveyor config file probably isn’t necessary)
>>>>  - Not sure what old-log4net.snk.gpg is in there for, either.
>>>>  - Gulp task source files missing headers
>>>> * Artifact signatures and sha512 hashes look good (checked with shasum
>>>> which is the Perl script version), contain appropriate LICENSE and
>>> NOTICE
>>>> (besides the outdated copyright year, but not a blocker), no binaries in
>>>> the source zip, appropriate files in the binary zip.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Matt Sicker
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 16, 2021, at 07:47, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd like to raise a vote to release log4net 2.0.14. Changelog is up on
>>> the
>>>>> pre-release page at
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4net/releases/tag/rc%2F2.0.14-rc1
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have updated staging docs and I _think_ I've done the right thing with
>>>>> respect to getting binaries and source up to the dev repo at
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging, but the download links
>>> on
>>>>> the staging docs point to the release download area, so I'm not sure if
>>> I
>>>>> should rather upload there so that staging documentation "works as
>>>>> expected" for the vote to continue.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks Ralph for assisting me in being able to uplodate artifacts
>>> myself.
>>>>> Much appreciated.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -d
>>>>> 
>>>>> PS. This email is a duplicate of the one sent from my work email (
>>>>> davyd.mcc...@codeo.co.za) which I believe has been lost somewhere
>>> along the
>>>>> way. Please ignore the other if it pops up.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>>> If you say that getting the money is the most important thing
>>>>> You will spend your life completely wasting your time
>>>>> You will be doing things you don't like doing
>>>>> In order to go on living
>>>>> That is, to go on doing things you don't like doing
>>>>> 
>>>>> Which is stupid.
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Alan Watts
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gXTZM_uPMY
>>>>> 
>>>>> *Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. *
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Dominik Psenner
> 

Reply via email to