FYI

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Chris Nauroth (Jira) <j...@apache.org>
Date: Wed, Feb 9, 2022, 14:11
Subject: [jira] [Resolved] (ZOOKEEPER-2342) Migrate to Log4J 2.
To: <ggreg...@apache.org>



     [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Chris Nauroth resolved ZOOKEEPER-2342.
--------------------------------------
    Resolution: Won't Do

ZOOKEEPER-4427 has been committed to migrate to Logback in a new major
version (with the option to swap out the SLF4J back-end if users prefer
Log4J 2). For prior version lines, discussion is under way on the dev
mailing list considering reload4j and the new bridge released by Apache
Logging.

I'm going to close out this issue, because there is no longer community
interest in the earlier Log4J 2 migration work from a few years ago. Thank
you to everyone who participated on this issue.

> Migrate to Log4J 2.
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2342
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2342
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>            Assignee: Chris Nauroth
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2342.001.patch
>
>
> ZOOKEEPER-1371 removed our source code dependency on Log4J.  It appears
that this also removed the Log4J SLF4J binding jar from the runtime
classpath.  Without any SLF4J binding jar available on the runtime
classpath, it is impossible to write logs.
> This JIRA investigated migration to Log4J 2 as a possible path towards
resolving the bug introduced by ZOOKEEPER-1371.  At this point, we know
this is not feasible short-term.  This JIRA remains open to track long-term
migration to Log4J 2.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to