I'm OK with our tooling requiring whatever makes our lives simplest as long we 
can guarantee that the target byte codes and *API calls* will work on Java 8 
for 2.x. 

Gary

On 2023/03/08 19:29:29 Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> I completely support both initiatives:
> 
> 1. Moving the JDK to 17 (why stay at 11?)
> 2. Moving `log4j-jmx-gui` to a separate repository
> 
> We have pulled a similar stunt in `log4j-tools`: it uses JDK 11, though
> targets 8. We can easily move `log4j-jmx-gui` to a separate repository by
> copying the project infra (README, CI, release process, etc.) from
> `log4j-tools`.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 10:45 PM Piotr P. Karwasz <piotr.karw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > Compiling 2.x using JDK 8 requires a lot of tricks:
> >
> > * Surefire scans classes using the main Maven JDK, so we must be sure
> > `module-info.class` and other Java 9+ classes are not on the test
> > classpath. This basically means we need to delete them before testing
> > and creating them afterwards.
> > * We need toolchains even if we disable tests,
> > * Some Maven or compiler plugins (like Error Prone) either require
> > Java 11 or are hard to configure on Java 8.
> >
> > That is why I would propose to bump the JDK requirement in the POM
> > file to JDK 11+ (for `log4j-jpl`) and add `--release 8` everywhere it
> > makes sense.
> >
> > For reproducibility purposes the CI and apache-release profiles would
> > still need to fix a JDK (JDK 17?) for compilation and a JRE (JRE 8)
> > for testing. But a casual user will be able to run the build process
> > without toolchains.
> >
> > I have a working prototype on this branch:
> >
> > https://github.com/ppkarwasz/logging-log4j2/tree/java17
> >
> > The only problem I wasn't able to solve is to compile `log4j-jmx-gui`
> > with JDK 11+: it requires `jconsole.jar` in the classpath, all JDK's
> > after 8 have a module for that. I think we could move it to a separate
> > repo.
> >
> > Remark that `log4j-api`, which uses `sun.reflect.Reflection`, compiles
> > perfectly with JDK 17 and `--release 8`.
> >
> > Piotr
> >
> 

Reply via email to