Log4j has deprecated JIRA in favor of GitHub Issues and enabled GitHub Discussions as an alternative (not replacement!) to mailing lists. So far it has been a great success[1]. I suggest doing the same for Log4cxx and Log4net too. Thoughts? Objections?
Note that I am not talking about only enabling these features. But to actively promote them on the website too. Check out the Log4j support page <https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/support.html> for an example. [1] Code was already on GitHub. Now we can refer to PRs, issues, commits, code blocks, etc. while having conversations on any GitHub text input. I find this quite convenient. IMO, as a result of this convenience, I see way more maintainer engagement in PRs and issues. Next to that, GitHub Discussions clearly enabled more user interactions. It works around the mailing list subscription barrier.
