+1
On January 12, 2026 10:53:05 AM GMT+01:00, "Volkan Yazıcı" <[email protected]> wrote: >As discussed earlier[1][2], I want to call a vote to retire[3] the >Log4j Scala API sub-project[4]. > >Please vote: > >[] +1, retire Log4j Scala API >[] -1, don't retire Log4j Scala API, because... > >Per Apache Voting Process[5], this is a "procedural issue", and >it follows the simple majority[6]. That is, if there are more +1 votes >than -1 ones, the issue is considered to have passed — regardless >of the number of votes in each category. > >PMC members have formally binding votes, but I encourage all >community members to vote, even if their votes are only advisory. > >[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1ktc1qxgwtnqd3zpshk017zfzfgkvp25 >[2] https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/discussions/4021 >[3] https://logging.apache.org/processes.html >[4] https://logging.apache.org/log4j/scala >[5] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >[6] https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#SimpleMajority
