Have you looked at the `Closed` tab?
See #3789 <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3789>, #3775
<https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/issues/3775>, #3968
<https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/3968>, etc.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:49 PM Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 5:45 PM Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I've walked through the entire `rel/2.25.0..2.x` commit list and
> prepared the
> > `2.26.0` milestone <
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/milestone/22>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I don't see any new features that would warrant a minor version bump,
> just bug fixes, so not use a 2.25.x label?
>
> Gary
>
> > for your view. See that this milestone still has some open issues. I've
> > nudged some of the contributors to respond to reviews and bring the PR to
> > the finish line so that it can be delivered in `2.26.0`.  I will wait
> for a
> > day or two for reactions, and fork the `release/2.26.0` branch from then
> > on. I will move the left over issues to the `2.x` milestone.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 1:40 PM Piotr P. Karwasz <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Volkan,
> > >
> > > On 15.04.2026 09:49, Volkan Yazıcı wrote:
> > > > I want to release `2.26.0` in a week or two, plus 1 week for the
> release
> > > > process.
> > > >
> > > > See the `2.26.0` milestone on GitHub:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/milestone/22
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for doing this. If you have time, can you make a short summary
> of
> > > the main features we want to deliver in `2.26.0`? If I remember
> > > correctly, there was a bunch of changes related to throwable formatting
> > > and we certainly want to change the defaults for TLS verification.
> > > Anything else?
> > >
> > > A partial migration to NIO has been started and I think we are only one
> > > PR short of delivering it (I must have a local branch for that).
> > >
> > > > Since `2.25.4` PRs (IMO, unfortunately) targeted the branch `2.25.x`
> > > > instead of first targeting `2.x` and then getting cherry-picked from
> > > `2.x`
> > > > to `2.25.x`, those changes don't appear on the `2.26.0` milestone.
> Hence,
> > > > for those, you need to include the `2.25.4` milestone changes
> > > > <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/milestone/25> too. I will
> > > land a
> > > > PR copying `src/changelog/2.25.4` contents to `src/changelog/.2.x.x`.
> > >
> > >
> > > Why would you want to duplicate the changes in `2.25.4`? They were
> > > delivered before the first 2.26.x version was released, so normally you
> > > assume they must be there.
> > >
> > > Piotr
> > >
>

Reply via email to